spot_img
मंगळवार, सप्टेंबर 23, 2025

9049065657

HomeUncategorizedN A T O - North Atlantic Treaty Organization

N A T O – North Atlantic Treaty Organization

The genesis of   NATO can be traced back to the Marshall plan created by George Marshall, then US Secretary of State for economic recovery of a war devastated Europe. This plan later on extended into Brussels Treaty of 1948 signed by the US, Great Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg. This plan has further promoted the idea of combined defense and cooperation  between the US and  Western Europe. These events acted as precursors to NATO. The founding North Atlantic Treaty which was signed on 4 April 1949.

The combined defense strategy helped Western European countries to focus on growth without large defense expenses. NATO was necessary to stop an aggressive Soviet Russia propagating communism and was particularly strong in East Europe. The adoption of the strategic doctrine of  ‘massive retaliation’ with the use of nuclear weapons if the Soviet attacks, even in small measure, helped West Europe enjoy peace.  NATO shielded Europe impressively.

Though NATO forbade nations of reviving militancy, many countries in Europe are now openly showing rightist inclination and are required to increase spending on defense on NATO’s directive. NATO’S modernization in the latest technology is trying to provide cyber security but falls short of expectations when Russian hackers broke into the US elections, network of Germany, and cyber network of many other countries. However, it’s to the credit of NATO that arms race and  nuclear threat in Europe remain under control.  

NATO’s policy of attack on one member considered as attack on all members provided collective security to members. Approval of all member countries is needed to admit a new country into NATO which made new country’s admittance a collective responsibility.  NATO’S adaptability to situations is seen from time to time. France opted out and then returned back to NATO without aggravating situation.  Turkey demanded extradition of Kurd freedom fighters from Sweden and Finland and refused approval to induct into NATO. NATO amicably settled the issue. But the 2019 Syrian invasion by Turkey raised concerns about NATO unity.

NATO, in a way,  West’s, and more particularly of US’ answer and main weapon to complex international crises. And, in the current challenging situation, NATO would escalate the war by deep attacks (before further polarization) on Russia’s strategic centers using Ukraine – shield and shielding Ukraine, too! The military preparations, readiness, increasing defense expenditure, F-16s to Ukraine, and modernizing nuclear deterrent all point out to combat readiness and a war plan till the last US government of US (President Joe Biden). This is changing fast after Donald Trump came back into power. He is considering a change in US policy towards NATO.

NATO IN EASTERN EUROPE

The lengthy Afghanistan crisis too, saw West and NATO struggled to control.  Even though NATO, and allied forces succeeded in overthrowing Taliban regiment and killing  Osama Bin Laden, they can not establish democracy and peace on Afghanistan soil. And, Libya too remained unstable, falling in the hands of unruly and opposing rebel groups though the Gaddafi regime was toppled. NATO and the US fail to bring democracy there.  However,  what NATO critiques think that the NATO’s role was over with the end of Soviet Russia is not totally correct.

It was the NATO deterrence that kept Russia in check and presently prevented the Ukraine war from spilling over into Europe. its successful new inclusions of Sweden and Finland encircled Russia, further isolating it and contributing to European safety. Ukraine’s persistence to become an EU and NATO member is one of the main cause of the Russian invasion along with rather a timid Western response when Crimea was taken over by Russia. At the start of the  Ukraine war, Russia clearly stated that let NATO officially refuse further expansion and close its doors ( for new membership)

In the recently concluded Washington summit (Celebrating 75 years of NATO), NATO almost declared a war on Russia. NATO’s reiteration of complete support to Ukraine, aid of 40 billion Euros, and weaponry with establishing NATO Security Assistance and Training for Ukraine would slow down Russian advance. China was admonished sternly and accused as ‘enabler of Russian war in Europe’. The summit asked member countries to ramp up industrial production and modernize nuclear deterrent.

After that 75th Summit, Russian spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said, “We see NATO’s decision to create logistic hubs in  Black Sea cities and open additional points in Europe. NATO’S military infrastructure is progressively moving towards our borders,”

Mark Rutte is the Secretary General of NATO from October 2024.The geopolitics is changing fast along with changes in trade and economy policies of a new US under president Trump. The new US is close to its archrival Russia and this is changing all the geo-politics of the Europe. Trump’s earlier declaration that he can finish the Ukraine – Russia war in a day before assuming presidency and then conducting a meeting with Russia excluding Ukraine raised many eyebrows and then the infamous meeting with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy along with straining relations with EU and distancing from Europe hangs the future of NATO in balance!

RELATED ARTICLES
Be the first to write a review

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Advertismentspot_img

Most Popular

- Advertisment -spot_img

Recent Comments